| Page 3

9th Annual Buckeye Bridge Bike Ride – June 23, 2012

Posted on January 13, 2012 by NPO

The 9th annual Buckeye Bridge Ride will be held June 23, 2012. The event will be held by the Preble County Junior Fair Board to raise funds. For more information check their new website at: www.buckeyebridgeride.com.

Share this article

New Paris, Ohio Village Council Meeting for January 9, 2012

Posted on January 10, 2012 by NPO

This is the second meeting of the evening and also the regularly scheduled council meeting. There were three speakers that were on the agenda. Denise Roberston and Eric White who are both running for Preble County Commissioner in the Republican Primary attended to introduce themselves and let council and video watchers learn some of their views on county issues. I believe both would make fine commissioners and look forward to voting for them.

Join the Forum discussion on this post

Share this article

DPL Energy Meeting on Village Electric Contract

Posted on January 10, 2012 by NPO

This is the first of two meetings held the evening of January 9, 2012. This one was on the electric aggregation agreement with DPL Energy. Anyone interested in the facts on this issue would do well to watch and listen to this meeting. Also posted is the hand out provided that night.

Note: This meeting can be watched on an internet ready tv or dvd player that has access to youtube. Search CFPCTV.

Join the Forum discussion on this post

Share this article

New Paris, Ohio Village Council – Emergency Meeting on Street Light Issue – December 28, 2011

Posted on January 5, 2012 by NPO

This is the video of the emergency meeting when the New Paris Village Council voted to accept the DP&L offer that kept the street lights on. The first DVD was bad and I just got one that worked today.

Share this article

New Paris Council Emergency Meeting of December 24, 2011 on Street Light Issue

Posted on December 30, 2011 by NPO

This is the 1st of two hearings scheduled by the New Paris Village Council to address the street light issue. The street lights were due to be turned off on January 1, 2012 without an new agreement. I picked up two dvds today but the December 28, 2011 meeting dvd will not work and I will try to get another copy next week. I did attend that meeting, it was very short and the village council passed an agreement that will not only keep the street lights on but also lower residents electric bills by a claimed 20% – 30%. Appears to be a good deal all around.

Share this article

Village Council schedules public hearings on street light issue

Posted on December 27, 2011 by NPO

New Paris Village Council has scheduled public hearings on the street light issue. The meetings will be held at the village building.

Times:

Saturday – December 24, at 10:00 a.m.

Wednesday – December 28 at 7:00 p.m.

Citizens and business owners concerned for or against the street lights going out should attend.

Join the Forum discussion on this post

Share this article

New Paris Village Council Meeting – December 05, 2011

Posted on December 7, 2011 by NPO

The New Paris, Ohio Village Council meeting for December 2011 is now available for viewing. This is the meeting where the decision to not renew the street light contract took place.

Share this article

New Paris Village Council Meeting November 15, 2011

Posted on November 27, 2011 by NPO

This is getting posted late because of issues with the old host. A switch to youtube will hopefully put an end to the problem.

Share this article

Preble County Economic Development Official Hoping For High Unemployment To Aid Goose Creek Crossing JRS Grant Application

Posted on November 12, 2011 by NPO

Preble County Official Hopes For High Unemployment

A sad day in Preble County.

One of the greatest betrayals of public trust by elected officials and publicly paid employees would have to be hoping for high unemployment figures among the people they serve. It is heart breaking to find such hope on the official record of the Preble County Commissioners.

The Preble County Commissioners owe the public an explanation and an apology as they sat there while it took place. It is time that the future of Preble County stops being held hostage to Goose Creek. People need jobs, not publically paid employees hoping that the unemployment rate stays high to score more points on a grant application.

At the 26 minute mark on the Monday, October 24, 2011 audio the Preble County Economic Development Director starts talking about the JRS grant application and the marketing plan for Goose Creek. Listen to: File 5B. The David & Jay that she refers to are the lead people from Kleingers the developers that the Commissioners chose for the $250,000 grant from the Dayton Development Coalition that had to be spent by March 1, 2010. The “marketing piece” that she refers to is worth (17 Points) (see Section 3 of the attached JRS Low Intensity Scoring Sheet).

Preble County Economic Development Director: File 5B: “I am just waiting on those last little pieces of information to put in there. I want it to be worded correctly and I am hoping that the ahh the unemployment rate is at a point where we will keep our points.”

Section 2 of the scoring sheet shows E: Unemployment Rate (3 Points)

What the Preble ED director is trying to do is get as many points and as high a score as possible to win the $750,000 JRS grant for Goose Creek.

The higher the unemployment the more likely it is “we (Preble County) keep our points”.

That is where the problem is. You have the Preble ED director hoping to keep the Preble County unemployment number high for a JRS grant application at Goose Creek. It begs the question how much effort has really gone into bringing those numbers down. It is also alarming that there is at least the appearance of complicity with the Preble County Development Partnership as they are mentioned as reviewing the marketing.

On September 23 the ED director turned in a report of accomplishments during the first year of employment. One of the ways to verify a strong effort to keep companies currently here is to get to know them with what is known as “Retention Visits”. The Preble County Economic Development Director's report showed a total of 24 retention visits had been made and that averages out to a pathetic two visits a month. It makes sense, though, when you read the comment from October 24 once again:

“I am hoping that the, ahh, the unemployment rate is at a point where we will keep our points.”

Grant points vs. Jobs? Trying to keep companies in Preble County or chase new? Think about those choices and on what side of those answers Preble County should be? The inaction of this commission to stop those comments implies that they agree with the ED director. Two of them are up for reelection in 2012, hoping for high unemployment in Preble County should not be tolerated.

I know that there will be those that say the comment was taken out of context or that the ED director miss-spoke but the audio record of the entire meeting is available online at: File 5

There is also further proof that was provided on October 26, 2011, just two days later in a meeting held in the Preble County Commission Chambers with the developers of Goose Creek. Here is a sample of the text:

1:30 P.M. – DAVID WRIGHT – JRS APPLICATION

Jay Stewart and David Wright for Kleingers in Commission Chambers.

Audio of the text below: File 6A or for higher bit rate file File 6B

Commissioner Day – There were some deficiencies that ahh questionable and I think ahh I was trying to think of the one. Oh shoot, it dealt with unemployment and Shawnda got clarification we could not utilize that I think.

Kleinger official - ??? and the distressed county status, she checked with the state. Again it is not one that we cannot physically get into. We are waiting and I don’t know what that newest data is on the ahh unemployment rate. We’re ahh well I shouldn’t say we’re hopeful but cause we were, actually we did. Last month it came out, we dipped below the next point kind of thresh hold, by like point somethin percent.

Commissioner Day – It was

Kleinger official - It was right

Commissioner Day – It was very small but we dropped

Kleinger official - Under it.

Commissioner Day - On that one

Kleinger official - You know

Commissioner Day - The one where we thought we might have a chance ahhh there were a couple others that I don’t remember what they are off the top of my head.

Unknown – The water and sewer deal, we think we’ve got a better chance of alleviating because we are further along in the process. We are better to write a better narrative towards that., just because where you guys are in the process but it is feasible that they could still ding us on that, because they are looking for it to be right there physically in the ground.

Kleinger official - If you at I guess from the committee what we did is ahhm two meetings in a row we took the scoring sheets. There are two separate scoring sheets there is one at the local level ahh Springfield and then there is one at the state level. We went through each one and kind of did a self scoring, you know exercise. Pointed out ways we could maybe get points and ahhm there’s two areas that are just glaring. Again the one I mentioned was; Are you going to have some degree of control over the development agreement. Ahh the other one is there’s that whole almost a whole page of utilities and basically I think it broke into three types of points. And ahh you know; Do you have the utilities to the site? We’re further along on water and sewer in terms of writing a narrative but that’s, if there is an Achilles heel it’s the utility piece.

The audio of the full meeting is available at the post from October 26, 2011, or listen to: File 6.

It’s your county people, your tax dollars pay these officials salary and it is your family, friends and neighbors that are in need of jobs. We simply cannot tolerate officials that hope for high unemployment.

The Preble County Commissioners can be reached at 456-8143

The ED Director's first annual report is posted below:

Share this article

November 8, 2011 Preble County Election Results

Posted on November 9, 2011 by NPO

SUMMARY REPORT General Election Final Unofficial Results

Run Date:11/09/11 November 8, 2011

RUN TIME:07:53 AM Preble County, Ohio

VOTES PERCENT

PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 43) . . . . . 43 100.00

REGISTERED VOTERS – TOTAL . . . . . 28,470

BALLOTS CAST – TOTAL. . . . . . . 13,665

VOTER TURNOUT – TOTAL . . . . . . 48.00

Member of Council – Eaton City

2 To Be Elected

Craig Moormeier . . . . . . . . 1,194 45.02

Gary Wagner. . . . . . . . . . 1,458 54.98

Mayor – Camden Village

1 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Member of Council – Camden Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Mayor – College Corner Village

1 To Be Elected

James R. Jackson . . . . . . . . 51 100.00

Member of Council – College Corner Village

2 To Be Elected

Bennie M. Banks . . . . . . . . 52 100.00

Board of Public Affairs – College Corner Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Mayor – Eldorado Village

1 To Be Elected

Tiana White. . . . . . . . . . 155 100.00

Clerk-Treasurer – Eldorado Village

1 To Be Elected

Karen Hunt . . . . . . . . . . 145 100.00

Member of Council – Eldorado Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Board of Public Affairs – Eldorado Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Mayor – Gratis Village

1 To Be Elected

Rodney E. Forrer . . . . . . . . 205 100.00

Member of Council – Gratis Village

2 To Be Elected

Carrie A. Forrer . . . . . . . . 146 48.03

David Johnston. . . . . . . . . 158 51.97

Mayor – Lewisburg Village

1 To Be Elected

Patrick W. Putnam. . . . . . . . 492 100.00

Member of Council – Lewisburg Village

2 To Be Elected

Marsha K. Jones . . . . . . . . 370 49.93

Mark R. Madigan . . . . . . . . 371 50.07

Mayor – New Paris Village

1 To Be Elected

Phil Carlotti 70

Neil Hoffman 237

Member of Council – New Paris Village

2 To Be Elected

Frank A. Serafini-Clingenpeel. . . . 194 36.40

Rick VanWinkle. . . . . . . . . 227 42.59

Nick Kieffer 116

Board of Public Affairs – New Paris Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Mayor – Verona Village

1 To Be Elected

Mary Myers . . . . . . . . . . 108 100.00

Member of Council – Verona Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Board of Public Affairs – Verona Village

2 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Mayor – West Alexandria Village

1 To Be Elected

Carol Lunsford. . . . . . . . . 377 100.00

Clerk-Treasurer – West Alexandria Village

1 To Be Elected

Judith C. Myers-Corn. . . . . . . 348 100.00

Member of Council – West Alexandria Village

2 To Be Elected

David Mays . . . . . . . . . . 277 47.03

James Wick . . . . . . . . . . 312 52.97

Mayor – West Elkton Village

1 To Be Elected

Bill Bates . . . . . . . . . . 38 100.00

Clerk-Treasurer – West Elkton Village

1 To Be Elected

NO CANDIDATE FILED . . . . . . . 0

Member of Council – West Elkton Village

2 To Be Elected

Bill Crawford . . . . . . . . . 41 100.00

Mayor – West Manchester Village

1 To Be Elected

Robert W. Long. . . . . . . . . 97 100.00

Clerk-Treasurer – West Manchester Village

1 To Be Elected

Leslie Evans . . . . . . . . . 94 100.00

Member of Council – West Manchester Village

2 To Be Elected

Jane T. Reeder. . . . . . . . . 97 100.00

Board of Public Affairs – West Manchester Village

2 To Be Elected

Douglas Evans . . . . . . . . . 80 47.90

Elisabeth Long. . . . . . . . . 87 52.10

Township Trustee – Dixon Township

1 To Be Elected

Steven D. Orr . . . . . . . . . 212 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Dixon Township

1 To Be Elected

Carol Bulach . . . . . . . . . 56 23.24

Christy Campbell . . . . . . . . 19 7.88

Beth E. Fornshell. . . . . . . . 166 68.88

Township Trustee – Gasper Township

1 To Be Elected

Eric White . . . . . . . . . . 891 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Gasper Township

1 To Be Elected

Anitra Roell . . . . . . . . . 816 100.00

Township Trustee – Gratis Township

1 To Be Elected

Paul Conway, Jr. . . . . . . . . 285 23.11

Jerry Thomas . . . . . . . . . 948 76.89

Township Fiscal Officer – Gratis Township

1 To Be Elected

Richard Bair . . . . . . . . . 625 51.36

Bobby Schneider . . . . . . . . 592 48.64

Township Trustee – Harrison Township

1 To Be Elected

Joe Conley . . . . . . . . . . 681 47.29

David L. Norvell . . . . . . . . 759 52.71

Township Fiscal Officer – Harrison Township

1 To Be Elected

Lorrie E. Ullery . . . . . . . . 758 52.06

Rosemary Webster . . . . . . . . 698 47.94

Township Trustee – Israel Township

1 To Be Elected

Robert A. Black . . . . . . . . 230 51.00

Frank D. Keeler . . . . . . . . 221 49.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Israel Township

1 To Be Elected

Lavon Wright . . . . . . . . . 357 100.00

Township Trustee – Jackson Township

1 To Be Elected

Michael G. Hans . . . . . . . . 285 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Jackson Township

1 To Be Elected

Kim Dees. . . . . . . . . . . 295 100.00

Township Trustee – Jefferson Township

1 To Be Elected

Richard Spahr . . . . . . . . . 792 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Jefferson Township

1 To Be Elected

Mary Mc. Wesler . . . . . . . . 729 100.00

Township Trustee – Lanier Township

1 To Be Elected

James E. Dillon . . . . . . . . 342 26.61

Clarence D. Eby . . . . . . . . 499 38.83

Michael L. Montgomery . . . . . . 444 34.55

Township Fiscal Officer – Lanier Township

1 To Be Elected

Mark L. McIntire . . . . . . . . 1,036 100.00

Township Trustee – Monroe Township

1 To Be Elected

Lloyd Lee . . . . . . . . . . 573 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Monroe Township

1 To Be Elected

Stephen M. Dearth. . . . . . . . 544 100.00

Township Trustee – Somers Township

1 To Be Elected

Keith L. George . . . . . . . . 953 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Somers Township

1 To Be Elected

Kelda S. Bittinger . . . . . . . 646 56.77

John C. Weiler. . . . . . . . . 492 43.23

Township Trustee – Twin Township

1 To Be Elected

Rodney Creech . . . . . . . . . 586 63.35

Richard Hamm . . . . . . . . . 339 36.65

Township Fiscal Officer – Twin Township

1 To Be Elected

Kay Johnson. . . . . . . . . . 691 100.00

Township Trustee – Washington Township

1 To Be Elected

James Ferriell. . . . . . . . . 546 100.00

Township Fiscal Officer – Washington Township

1 To Be Elected

Charles H. Christman. . . . . . . 521 100.00

Governing Board of Education – Preble County

2 To Be Elected

Kevin A. Johnston. . . . . . . . 4,496 49.29

Carrie M. Steele . . . . . . . . 4,625 50.71

Governing Board of Education – Montgomery County

2 To Be Elected

Daryl Marvin Michael, Jr. . . . . . 11 40.74

Greg S. Shell . . . . . . . . . 16 59.26

Member of Board of Education – Eaton CSD

2 To Be Elected

John M. Brueggemann . . . . . . . 1,342 22.73

Terry V. Parks. . . . . . . . . 2,066 34.99

Joseph E. Renner . . . . . . . . 2,496 42.28

Member of Board of Education – Edgewood CSD

2 To Be Elected

Amy R. Ashcraft . . . . . . . . 4 17.39

Richard L. Hurchanik. . . . . . . 10 43.48

Tom Oligee . . . . . . . . . . 3 13.04

Mark S. Pelfrey . . . . . . . . 4 17.39

Eric Puska . . . . . . . . . . 0

James W. Sheffstall . . . . . . . 1 4.35

Scott Smith. . . . . . . . . . 1 4.35

Member of Board of Education – Talawanda CSD

3 To Be Elected

Mark L. Butterfield . . . . . . . 30 37.97

Michael W. Crowder . . . . . . . 22 27.85

Darrell Smith . . . . . . . . . 27 34.18

Member of Board of Education – Brookville LSD

3 To Be Elected

John E. Gordon. . . . . . . . . 19 29.23

Richard M. Phillips . . . . . . . 12 18.46

Scott Rutherford . . . . . . . . 24 36.92

Richard Allen Sommer. . . . . . . 10 15.38

Member of Board of Education – College Corner LSD

2 To Be Elected

Michael S. McDonough. . . . . . . 93 49.73

John Seibert . . . . . . . . . 94 50.27

Member of Board of Education – National Trail LSD

2 To Be Elected

Barbara Cox. . . . . . . . . . 1,013 32.15

David Harris . . . . . . . . . 969 30.75

Greg M. McWhinney. . . . . . . . 1,169 37.10

Member of Board of Education – Preble Shawnee LSD

2 To Be Elected

Tom Crumbaker . . . . . . . . . 1,697 46.88

Kristal Janson. . . . . . . . . 778 21.49

Barbara Strickland . . . . . . . 1,145 31.63

Member of Board of Education – Preble Shawnee LSD

(Unexpired Term)

1 To Be Elected

Charles Biggs . . . . . . . . . 1,816 100.00

Member of Board of Education – Tri-County North LSD

3 To Be Elected

Larry D. Seibel . . . . . . . . 959 25.85

Susan H. Steck. . . . . . . . . 989 26.66

Vickie L. Woodyard . . . . . . . 962 25.93

Lisa Wymer . . . . . . . . . . 800 21.56

Member of Board of Education – Twin Valley LSD

2 To Be Elected

Tim Beneke . . . . . . . . . . 962 41.09

James L. Pemberton . . . . . . . 917 39.17

John Ratliff 219

Member of Board of Education – Valley View LSD

2 To Be Elected

Tom Geglein. . . . . . . . . . 1 50.00

Jenny Michael . . . . . . . . . 1 50.00

1 State Issue – Proposed Constitutional Amendment,

To increase the maximum age to be judge

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,899 38.27

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,902 61.73

2 State Issue – Referendum on a new law relative to

government union and employee contracts

YES (To approve the law) . . . . . 5,753 42.60

NO (To reject the law) . . . . . . 7,753 57.40

3 State Issue – Proposed Constitutional Amendment,

Freedom to choose health care

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,089 75.81

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,220 24.19

10 Dixon Twp – Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 68.70

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 31.30

11 Gasper Twp, Renewal, 2.1 Mills, Fire and Emergency

Medical Services, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 885 72.19

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 341 27.81

12 Harrison Twp, Renewal, 0.6 Mill, Cemetery

Maintenance, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 1,043 66.60

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 523 33.40

13 Jackson Twp, Renewal, 2 Mills, 0.5 Mill Reduction,

3 Years, Fire Protection and Ambulance Service

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 277 77.59

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 80 22.41

14 Jefferson Twp, Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 54.00

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 46.00

15 Monroe Twp, Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 66.57

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 33.43

16 Somers Twp, Renewal, 0.6 Mill, Cemetery

Maintenance, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 653 54.92

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 536 45.08

17 Twin Twp, Emergency Service District, Renewal,

2 Mills, Fire Protection, 5 Years, excludes W. Alex.

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 562 70.60

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 234 29.40

18 Washington Twp, Additional, 1 Mill, Ambulance

and Medical Service, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 273 37.81

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 449 62.19

19 College Corner LSD, Replacement, 6.5 Mills,

Improvements, etc., 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 93 63.27

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 54 36.73

20 Tri-County North LSD, Renewal, 5.3 Mills, Providing

for emergency requirements, 10 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 1,245 66.33

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 632 33.67

21 Tri-County North LSD, Renewal, 2 Mills, Improving

and renovating school buildings, etc., 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 1,241 66.12

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 636 33.88

22 Twin Valley Community LSD, Income Tax, 0.75%,

Renewal, Current Expenses, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX. . . . . . . . . . 1,160 59.64

AGAINST THE TAX . . . . . . . . 785 40.36

23 Preble County, Renewal, 0.6 Mill, Children services

programs, etc., 4 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 7,751 58.17

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 5,573 41.83

24 Preble County, Renewal, 0.4 Mill, Children services

programs, etc., 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 7,445 56.27

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 5,785 43.73

25 Preble County, Renewal, 1 Mill, Senior

Citizens services, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 9,161 68.66

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 4,181 31.34

26 Preble County, Renewal, 0.3 Mill, Health

programs, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 7,927 59.69

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 5,353 40.31

27 City of Eaton, Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,064 49.01

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,107 50.99

28 Camden Village, Renewal of 4 Mills, Increase of

1 Mill, Current Operating Expenses, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 183 33.89

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 357 66.11

29 Camden Village, Renewal of 6 Mills, Increase of

1 Mill, Police Protection, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 185 34.01

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 359 65.99

30 College Corner Village, Renewal, 5.2 Mills, Fire

Protection, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 48 81.36

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 11 18.64

31 Gratis Village, Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 40.41

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 59.59

32 Lewisburg Village, Renewal, 1 Mill, Parks and

Recreational purposes, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 446 79.64

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 114 20.36

33 New Paris Village, Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 51.03

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 48.97

34 New Paris Village, Referendum Petition, Income Tax

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 36.65

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 63.35

35 Verona Village, Additional, 1 Mill, Police

Protection, 1 Year

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 46 38.33

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 74 61.67

36 Verona Village, Replacement, 1.9 Mills, Current

Operating Expenses, 4 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 61 50.00

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 61 50.00

37 Verona Village, Replacement, 2 Mills, Current

Operating Expenses, 4 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 59 47.97

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 64 52.03

38 West Alexandria Village, Electric Aggregation

YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 48.11

NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 51.89

39 West Elkton Village, Renewal, 1 Mill,

Emergency Ambulance Service, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 28 50.00

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 28 50.00

40 West Elkton Village, Renewal, 1 Mill,

Emergency Ambulance Service, 5 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 26 45.61

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 31 54.39

41 West Manchester Village, Additional, 2 Mills,

Police Protection, 3 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 47 38.52

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 75 61.48

42 Miami Valley Career Technology Center, Replacement,

2.18 Mills, Current Operating Expenses, 10 Years

FOR THE TAX LEVY . . . . . . . . 6,602 50.37

AGAINST THE TAX LEVY. . . . . . . 6,506 49.63

May 2012
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Apr
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31